12-year-old, male castrated, Cocker Spaniel presented with hemorrhagic diarrhea and tenesmus for 2–3-week duration.
Photograph of the dog’s perineum is provided below.
Ultrasound videos concentrating on the colon are provided below.
The descending colon has an intussusception that courses past the pelvic canal. The intussusceptum is small and surrounded by moderately hyperechoic mesentery. The intussuscipiens has moderately diffusely thick wall. Luminal colonic contents orad to the intussusception is strongly shadowing.
Other findings not provided in images above:
Liver is mildly diffusely enlarged, and contains few, small, hypoechoic nodules that do not bulge the margins. Gallbladder contains a small to medium amount of hyperechoic material. Body of the spleen contains a small (2.1 cm), well marginated, round, heterogenous, mainly hyperechoic mass that mildly bulge the margins. Pancreas is moderately diffusely enlarged and moderately irregularly marginated. Other organs were unremarkable.
1. Colonic intussusception
2. Small splenic mass
3. Moderate, diffuse pancreatopathy
4. Mild, diffuse hepatomegaly and nodular hepatopathy
5. Mild cholestasis
Dog transferred to AMC for evaluation of intussusception. At presentation, patient was alert, responsive, tachycardic, mildly hypertensive, 5 % dehydrated, moderately tense on abdominal palpation with an approximately 2 cm colonic prolapse. Prolapse was painful, discolored and diarrhea exuded from lumen. Packed cell volume 35%, total solids 9.0 and blood gas analysis revealed mild metabolic acidosis.
Due to inherent limitations of the modality, the ultrasound did not determine the true extent of the intussusception and its relation to the rectal prolapse. The ultrasound also did not have information regarding vascular integrity of the colon walls. Computed Tomography was recommended for further evaluation prior to surgery (see below).
A colonic- colonic intussusception is noted, beginning cranially at the level of the ileocolic junction. The beginning of the ascending colon becomes the intussusceptum just caudal to the ileocolic junction at the level of the left kidney. The intussusceptum spans the entirety of the dilated intussusceptien, extending to the pelvic inlet and perineum. The normally contrast enhancing wall of the intussusceptum becomes lost, particularly the left lateral wall, as it extends to the rectum. For approximately 2.7 cm length, the caudal most aspect of the colonic intussusceptum is prolapsed from the rectum, exposed to surrounding air and has complete loss of normal wall layering. Arterial phase (not shown) did not identify any loss of arterial supply to the colon. A hypo-attenuating liver nodule is most visible on the first two venous phases but becomes iso-attenuating to the regional normal liver on the last venous phase. A mildly capsule deforming splenic nodule remains heterogenous in the head of the spleen.
1. Colonic-colonic intussusception, to include prolapse of part of the intussusceptum through the rectum.
2. Suspect vascular compromise/necrosis to the prolapsed portion of the intussusceptum.
3. Mild ileocolic lymphadenopathy.
4. Nonspecific hypoattenuating and capsule deforming nodule of the spleen and liver.
The colonic-colonic intussusception extended caudally through the pelvic inlet and is involved in the prolapse. There is loss of mucosal contrast enhancement and wall layering of the colon caudal to the pelvic inlet (suggesting vascular compromise), but mucosal enhancement of colon in the abdomen remained intact. Surgical intervention is recommended.
The loss of enhancement pattern on later imaging of the liver nodule suggests benign etiologies. The splenic nodule is non-specific, perhaps related to benign etiologies though malignancy cannot be ruled out.
None of the walls associated with the intussusception have evidence of mass. However, neoplasia as a reason for the intussusception cannot be ruled out.
Abdominal laparotomy revealed the intussusception was mostly viable. Intussusception extended from the transverse colon through the pelvic canal with necrotic tissue exuding from the rectum. Prolapse was partially reduced per rectum, resection and end-to-end anastomosis of the colon was performed, removing approximately 5 cm of affected tissue. Splenectomy, subcutaneous mass removal and liver biopsy performed.
– Spleen Histopathology: Splenic nodular hyperplasia
– Resected Descending Colon Histopathology: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor vs Leiomyosarcoma: Immunohistochemistry: PENDING
– Liver Biopsy: Nodular hyperplasia with vacuolar degeneration
Abdominal ultrasonographic findings that have been reported for intussusceptions include target-like mass with multiple hyperechoic and hypoechoic concentric rings around a hyperechoic center on transverse images. Longitudinal sections consists of hyperechoic and hypoechoic parallel lines. The most common form of intussusception in dogs is at the ileocolic junction. Common causes include foreign bodies, parasitism, intestinal masses, viral enteritis and previous intestinal surgery.
With abdominal ultrasound, Patsikas 2005, reported that if color doppler indicated blood flow within mesenteric vessels of intussuscepted intestine, surgical reducibility of affected tissue was possible in 75% of dogs. Venous blood flow may be more diagnostic when determining reducibility since congestion of venous vessels leads to edematous congestion of the serosal layer causing fibrous adhesions. As a result, reducibility is less likely.
With Computed Tomography, Tsuka et al 2020, reports the advantages of CT as follows: able to distinguish layers of intestinal wall with a gas filled lumen, allows pursuit of proximal to distal course of intestine to estimate size/region or origin, and contrast enhancement can differentiate intraluminal hemorrhage, inflammation, neoplasia or mesenteric ischemia in human medicine. Lee et al. 2009, described that the evaluation of intestinal wall contrast enhancement was also possible in the intestinal and venous phase technique which may be useful in the evaluation of mesenteric circulation in dogs. Barge et al 2020. described a dog with poor enhancement of the colonic wall, had extensive necrosis at the time of surgery.
Colonic-colonicc intussusceptions are not commonly reported in dogs. The chronicity of disease as well as appearance of prolapsed intussusceptum at presentation led to concern of the colonic viability. Multiphasic contrast-enhancement CT was able to determine the viability, origin, and extent of the affected area as well as guide surgical intervention.
Neither CT nor surgical evaluation of the non-viable portion of the colon suggested an underlying neoplastic process. However, considering the presentation of this intussusception in an older dog, neoplasia as a cause of the intussusception could not be ruled out.
Ahmed, E.A., Elatty, K.A., Ezzat Mahdy, R., Emara, D.M., Header, D.A., 2021. Computed Tomography Enterocolongraphy In Assessment Of Degree Of Ulcerative Colitis Activity. International Journal of Clinical Practice.. doi:10.1111/ijcp.14626
Chow, K.E., Stent, A.W., Milne, M., 2014. IMAGING DIAGNOSIS-USE OF MULTIPHASIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF MESENTERIC VOLVULUS IN A DOG. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 55, 74–78.. doi:10.1111/vru.12053
Drost, W.T., Green, E.M., Zekas, L.J., Aarnes, T.K., Su, L., Habing, G.G., 2016. COMPARISON OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY FOR DETECTION OF CANINE MECHANICAL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 57, 366–375.
Fitzgerald, E., Lam, R., Drees, R., 2017. IMPROVING CONSPICUITY OF THE CANINE GASTROINTESTINAL WALL USING DUAL PHASE CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: A RETROSPECTIVE CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 58, 151–162.. doi:10.1111/vru.12467
Gummadi, S., Koenig, G., Wessner, C.E., Machado, P., Stem, J., Forsberg, F., Liu, J., Lyshchik, A., O’Kane, P., Eisenbrey, J.R., 2021. Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound in Small Intestinal Ischemia. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.. doi:10.1002/jum.15763
Lamb, C.R., Mantis, P., 1998. Ultrasonographic features of intestinal intussusception in 10 dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice 39, 437–441.. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03752.x
Larson, M.M., Biller, D.S., 2009. Ultrasound of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 39, 747-759., doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.04.010
Lee S-K, Yoon S, Kim C, Choi J. Triple- phased mesenteric CT angiography using a test bolus technique for evaluation of the mesenteric vasculature and small intesti- nal wall contrast enhancement in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2019;60:493–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12781
Levien, A.S., Baines, S.J., 2011. Histological examination of the intestine from dogs and cats with intussusception. Journal of Small Animal Practice 52, 599–606.. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01128.x
Levitt, L, and M S Bauer. “Intussusception in dogs and cats: A review of 36 cases.” The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne vol. 33,10 (1992): 660-4.
Patsikas, M.N., Papazoglou, L.G., Jakovljevic, S., Dessiris, A.K., 2005. COLOR DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN PREDICTION OF THE REDUCIBILITY OF INTUSSUSCEPTED BOWEL IN 15 YOUNG DOGS. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound 46, 313–316.. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00058.x
Penninck, D.G., Nyland, T.G., Kerr, L.Y., Fisher, P.E., 1990. ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES IN SMALL ANIMALS. Veterinary Radiology 31, 134–141.. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8261.1990.tb01852.x
Tsuka T, Osaki T, Okamoto Y, Morita T, Sunden Y, et al. Combined Use of Computed Tomography and Endoscopy for Diagnosis of Cecocolic Intussuception in a Dog. J Vet Med Animal Sci. 2020; 3(1): 1038.